0xdb095d5a4f412fc6b14e6204c1db78bd14becbc1The read
This wallet has +$6.71M of perpetuals profit across 248 days of public trading, an average of +$27,042.26 a day. That average hides the shape of it, which is what the rest of this page is about.
They have moved $120.42M of volume to get there, keeping 5.57% of everything they traded. That is a healthy margin per dollar traded, which leaves more room for the slippage and fees a copier picks up.
The worst drop on this record is 60.0% of peak profit, severe, and the kind of stretch most people stop copying in the middle of. At the worst point they had handed back $4.05M of a $6.76M peak.
On timing, the longest stretch below a previous high ran 5 weeks, and they spent 28.5% of the record below a previous high. A copier joining at the wrong moment lives through that stretch from the start, with none of the gains that came before it to sit on.
Their worst single week was -$2.12M. The best week was +$2.63M.
Over the last 90 days the equity curve is reasonably steady, with visible flat and choppy patches (R² 0.73). The lumpier the line, the more the outcome depends on which week a copier happens to start.
27 of 34 weeks finished up, a 79% hit rate. More weeks win than lose, which tends to be easier to hold on to than a record built from a few large winners.
Risk-adjusted, weekly: Sharpe 2.08, Sortino 4.24, Calmar 6.07. These compare return against how bumpy the ride was, so a high return with a rough curve scores worse than the headline suggests.
Cumulative profit sits at 99.2% of its peak, at or near its all-time high, so there is no open drawdown to recover from.
Written from this wallet's scored on-chain history, not from anything it says about itself. Nothing here is advice or a recommendation to copy. Past performance does not predict future results.
Track record summary
This trader has had severe drops along the way — size carefully. Every figure below is derived from the public Hyperliquid trading history of wallet 0xdb095d5a4f412fc6b14e6204c1db78bd14becbc1, not from self-reported results. Past performance does not predict future results, and a copier's outcome differs from the trader's because of timing, slippage, fees and account size.
Figures from the last scoring run (2026-09-27). The panels above this summary poll Hyperliquid live and can differ — notably the header account value, which includes spot balances, while the scored figure is the trading account alone.
The Mirror Score weighs nine signals, with the largest weight on maximum observed drawdown — the selection methodology publishes every weight and evidence floor. See how this wallet compares in the ranking of qualified Hyperliquid traders, or read how Hyperliquid copy trading works before copying anyone.