A Hyperliquid leaderboard, ranked by evidence.

What “best” means on this page

Most Hyperliquid trader lists rank by total profit. That figure is the easiest one to publish and the least useful one to copy, because it can reflect a single outsized position, a large deposit, high leverage or a stretch of risk the headline never shows. Ranking by profit alone reliably puts the hardest wallets to copy at the top.

This ranking uses the Mirror Score instead. It combines nine signals, and maximum observed drawdown carries the largest single weight, so a trader who reached the same profit through a calmer equity curve outranks one who reached it through a violent one. Consistency, momentum, annual return, risk-adjusted return, profit capacity and trading efficiency make up the rest. Every weight, evidence floor and known limitation is published in the selection methodology.

Qualification and display use different time windows. A sampled drawdown of 60% or more within the trailing 12 months disqualifies a wallet. The Worst dip column shows the all-time sampled figure, so a trader can remain qualified while displaying an older drawdown above 60%. Neither measure necessarily captures every intraday move.

Read the record before you copy anyone

A high score is a reason to look closer, not a reason to skip the work. Open the profile and check how concentrated the current book is, how much leverage is in use, how long the record actually runs and how the worst dip compares to the peak profit. A profitable market maker or very fast trader can still be a poor copy target, because a follower may never reproduce the same entry, exit or fill quality.

Then decide how exposure should begin. Full-book mode moves you toward the trader's current portfolio, including positions opened earlier at prices you will not get. Forward-only mode waits for their next action instead. The trade-off between the two is covered in the copy trading guide.

Frequently asked questions